Fact-finder’s report – Executive Branch master contract

New Hampshire Supreme Court Appeal

Approximately two years ago, the SEA won two unfair labor practice charges in front of the Public Employee Labor Relations Board(PELRB). The first regarded a letter from the Governor to employees influencing them on how they should vote on a fact-finder report, and the second was the Governor’s refusal to place the fact finder’s report on the governor and council agenda to be voted upon. The State appealed the finding that it committed an unfair labor practice, direct dealing, and otherwise interfering with the union’s administration.

On March 15, 2022, the SEA legal team presented oral arguments regarding these matters. As soon as we know the outcome, we will let you know.

Fact-Finder Reports

The fact finder’s reports regarding the NHLC, DOT, and DOS have been submitted to the Joint Committee on Employee Relations (JCER) to have the legislature vote on the reports.

Important links
Frequently asked questions

Why didn’t we reach an agreement?

The fact-finder’s report was extremely favorable to the SEA, finding our arguments on many of the articles of contention compelling, however, the state’s last best offer is insufficient.

Media release on Fact-finding

Media Contact:
Christine Turgeon 603.333.0478

Third-Party Report Slams Governor’s Proposals to Unions

Concord, NH – After receiving an extremely favorable fact-finder report, the State Employees’ Association continued negotiations with the governor’s bargaining team that ultimately refused to offer state employees fair wages.

“As we said from the very beginning, we will not accept a concessionary contract. We are thrilled to see that the fact-finder agrees with protecting our members,” said Leah McKenna, co-chair of the negotiating team and SEA member.

Mary Ellen Shea, the neutral fact-finder, tasked with reviewing the myriad of issues before the two parties, sided with the SEA on a majority of issues. For example, in regards to the State’s attempt to short-change wages due to rising healthcare costs, she wrote “There is no reason the increased costs should be shouldered entirely by the employees. If the employees are expected to absorb all increased costs associated with a basic benefit such as healthcare, what incentive does the State have to manage or control cost increases?”

The report further recommends that wage increases for employees “must be 2.86% for the first year and 1.16% for the second year” and cited previous wage recommendations that used verified economic data as part of her assessment. The governor’s paltry wage proposal is not aligned with the report’s findings.

The fact-finder also recommended the following items in favor of the SEA:

  • Access to benefits under the existing Connor’s Law for state employees who have autistic children and dependents. Currently, the law does not cover state employees and it is reasonable for them to enjoy the same benefits as other Granite Staters.

  • Increases hazardous duty and direct care pay and codifies it in the contract

  • The fact-finder did not recommend changes. The state’s proposed changes to time worked language would have lowered wages for employees who work overtime and use leave in the same pay period

  • The fact-finder did not recommend the governor’s Family Medical Leave Insurance proposal asserting that the program “must have some cost…the State did not refute the union’s evidence and has not demonstrated that its proposal will not create a financial burden that, down the road, might require limits on other benefits or employee wages.”

Union negotiators stress their willingness to reach an agreement that does not sacrifice wages. “We are always willing to negotiate at the table, working with this report as the basis to achieve a contract,” concluded Jim Nall, co-chair of the negotiating team and union member.

Due to New Hampshire’s booming economy often cited by the governor, the coalition of unions (NEPBA,

NH Troopers Association, NH Troopers Association Command Staff, and SEA/SEIU Local 1984) are standing in solidarity with the fact-finder’s report and refusing to concede to the governor’s inadequate wage proposal. A full copy of the fact-finder’s report can be found here.


Subscribe to our Newsletter